enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

    The covenant may be negative or affirmative. A negative covenant is one in which property owners are unable to perform a specific activity, such as block a scenic view. An affirmative covenant is one in which property owners must actively perform a specific activity, such as keeping the lawn tidy or paying homeowner's association dues for the ...

  3. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center...

    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United ...

  4. Default (finance) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_(finance)

    Technical default occurs when an affirmative or a negative covenant is violated. Affirmative covenants are clauses in debt contracts that require firms to maintain certain levels of capital or financial ratios. The most commonly violated restrictions in affirmative covenants are tangible net worth, working capital/short term liquidity, and debt ...

  5. Blue pencil doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_pencil_doctrine

    In most jurisdictions, courts routinely "blue pencil" or reform covenants that are deemed not reasonable. The blue pencil doctrine gives courts the authority to strike unreasonable clauses from a non-compete agreement, leaving the rest to be enforced, or actually to modify the agreement to reflect the terms that the parties originally could have and probably should have agreed to. [3]

  6. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Bollinger, which held constitutional the University of Michigan Law School’s affirmative action program. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) A narrowly tailored use of race in student admission decisions may be permissible under the Equal Protection Clause because a diverse student body is beneficial to all students.

  7. Christian Legal Society v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Legal_Society_v...

    Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld, against a First Amendment challenge, the policy of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, governing official recognition of student groups, which required the groups to accept all students regardless of their status or beliefs in order to obtain ...

  8. Loan covenant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loan_covenant

    The legal provision in the loan agreement providing for the loan to be "called" is the "acceleration clause": once the buyer defaults, all future payments due under the loan are "accelerated" and deemed to be due and payable immediately. [1] Covenants may also be waived, either temporarily or permanently, usually at the sole discretion of the ...

  9. 1998 California Proposition 227 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_California...

    Proposition 227 [2] was a California ballot proposition passed on the June 2, 1998, ballot. Proposition 227 was repealed by Proposition 58 on November 8, 2016. According to Ballotpedia, "Proposition 227 changed the way that "Limited English Proficient" (LEP) students are taught in California. Specifically, it