Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Contractors State License Board (CSLB) follows a long history of consumer protection and licensing in California. Consumer protection began in 1876 when California passed the Medical Practice Act which would use licensing to combat completely unregulated medical practice.
California's "Shine the Light" law (CA Civil Code § 1798.83 [1] [2]) is a privacy law passed by the California State Legislature in 2003. It became an active part of the California Civil Code on January 1, 2005.
The California Public Records Act (Statutes of 1968, Chapter 1473; currently codified as Division 10 of Title 1 of the California Government Code) [1] was a law passed by the California State Legislature and signed by governor Ronald Reagan in 1968 requiring inspection or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law.
Institutions are also required to create a formal policy on what will be disclosed and controls around them along with the validation and frequency of these disclosures. In general, the disclosures under Pillar 3 apply to the top consolidated level of the banking group to which the Basel II framework applies.
Contractors State License Board (CSLB) Controller's Office, California State (SCO) Cool California (CoolCal) Corrections & Rehabilitation, Department of (CDCR) Counties, California State Association of (CSAC) Court Reporters Board of California (CRB) Courts, California (Courts) Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health, Council on (CCJBH)
Kyle Chester De Los Reyes, 23, is accused of murdering three of his family members in their Baldwin Park home in Pomona, California around 6:48 p.m. on Dec. 26, Hochman said.
By Clark Mindock (Reuters) -Major U.S. business groups sued California on Tuesday seeking to overturn the state's new sweeping climate disclosure laws that require companies to publicly report ...
He then served on the Board of California Common Cause from 1986–91, acting as its Litigation Chair from 1989–91. One of his cases was an unsuccessful attempt to remove the requirement that judges seeking re-election finance their own ballot statement – at a cost approaching the annual salary for a superior court position.