Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
When the eighth-grade girl arrived at Eastlake Middle School in Lake County on Sept. 7, another student approached the girl, asking if she wanted to smoke a new vape pen, the girl’s mother said ...
Popular Smoke and Vape paid $1,000 to the state of Kentucky to settle a case for selling a vape product to a minor without asking for age or identification at one of its Louisville stores on July ...
Statewide vaping ban: Effective September 30, 2021, according to Chapter 3794 of the Ohio Revised Code, vaping is prohibited in all places where smoking is prohibited (which includes bars and restaurants), with the exception of retail establishments that make at least 80% of their gross revenue from the sale of vaping products. [29]
The Ohio Senate may side with the House to override Gov. DeWine's veto of a law that would preempt municipal control of flavored tobacco. Columbus ban on flavored tobacco begins Jan. 1 as state ...
A zero-tolerance policy in schools is a policy of strict enforcement of school rules against behaviors or the possession of items deemed undesirable. In schools, common zero-tolerance policies concern physical altercations, as well as the possession or use of illicit drugs or weapons. Students, and sometimes staff, parents, and other visitors ...
The sale and distribution of e-cigarettes is prohibited. The existing laws on tobacco control also apply to e-cigarettes. Argentina: banned [309] banned [309] 18 [309] applies [309] prohibited [309] The sale and distribution of e-cigarettes is prohibited. The existing laws on tobacco control also apply to e-cigarettes. [309] Bahamas: legal [316 ...
Dozens of new laws passed by the 2024 General Assembly take effect today in Kentucky. Among some of the most high-profile items are measures on crime, education and health care, but the 60-day ...
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution allows states to outlaw the possession, as distinct from the distribution, of child pornography. [1] In doing so, the Court extended the holding of New York v.