Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case is Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-04792. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)
Anyone who wants a cut of Oracle's $115 million proposed settlement agreement must submit a claim by or before a looming deadline. ... Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement ...
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593 U.S. 1 (2021), [1] ... The decision reversed the Federal Circuit ruling and remanded the case for further review.
On March 22, 2007, Oracle filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California accusing SAP and TomorrowNow of corporate theft on a "grand scale". [ 5 ] [ 6 ] According to Oracle, TomorrowNow had downloaded thousands of documents and programs from Oracle's Customer Connection technical support website.
Google v. Oracle has absolutely no bearing. The claim that Micro Focus is "the owner of Unix" is based on a court judgement against SCO that references "the older Unix software". By this, they mean the System V source code. This is a completely separate, irrelevant, now long settled issue.
The case is Hayes et al v. Kraft Heinz Co, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 23-16596. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Rod Nickel)
The Court cited three prior Supreme Court cases limiting awards to those specified by Congress: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc. (1987), West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey (1991), and Arlington Central School District Board of Education v.
The case is In re: Nissan North America Inc Litigation, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-5950. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Sandra Maler) Show comments.