enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of...

    The CDFE, now the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), and Activision Blizzard announced they had settled the lawsuit on December 15, 2023, pending court approval. As part of the settlement, Activision Blizzard will set aside $54 million, with $47 million to deal with pay and promotion inequalities against female employees, and will bring ...

  3. Character evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_evidence

    The admissibility of character evidence to allow the defendant to prove the character trait of a victim is limited, however, if the lawsuit is for rape or assault with the intent to commit rape. If the reputation or opinion evidence is being offered by the defendant to show the rape victim's past sexual conduct, character evidence is inadmissible.

  4. Plata v. Schwarzenegger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plata_v._Schwarzenegger

    Plata v. Newsom, Docket No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST (), is a federal class action civil rights lawsuit alleging that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's (CDCR) medical services are inadequate and violate the Eighth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

  5. The-Dream calls sexual battery lawsuit 'character ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/dream-calls-sexual-battery-lawsuit...

    The-Dream responded in court to a lawsuit accusing him of "luring" a woman into an "abusive" relationship and asked a judge to dismiss the claims. The-Dream calls sexual battery lawsuit 'character ...

  6. California lawsuit says Ralphs broke the law by asking job ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-lawsuit-says-ralphs...

    California sued the Ralphs supermarket chain on Thursday, alleging that it violated state law by asking job-seekers whether they had criminal records and illegally rejecting hundreds of applicants.

  7. Coleman v. Schwarzenegger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_v._Schwarzenegger

    Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, docket no. 2:90-cv-00520-LKK-JFM (), is a federal class action civil rights lawsuit under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 alleging unconstitutional mental health care by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).

  8. Unfortunately, the law is being grossly manipulated, with attorneys filing shakedown-style lawsuits to benefit themselves at the expense of workers, non-profits and small businesses.

  9. Brown v. Plata - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Plata

    Coleman v. Brown [2] [3] (Previously Coleman v. Wilson) (), is a federal class action civil rights lawsuit under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 alleging unconstitutional mental health care by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).