Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
The 2024 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in and can be cited as: "Academic-written review". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal=
Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. If ...
This page documents a template used by Wikipedia:Peer Review. For how editors use peer reviews, see WP:PR/Instructions . For an overview of the technical process, see Wikipedia:Peer review/Tools .
Academic peer reviewed}} - a similar template for articles, where content has been published in a peer reviewed journal {{External peer review}} - a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review
This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:Academic-written review to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki; see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page. You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses. You can test how this page looks ...
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).
B-class review This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria. It is suitably referenced, with in-line citation :