enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mckesson v. Doe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mckesson_v._Doe

    Mckesson v. Doe, 592 U.S. 1 (2020), [1] was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that temporarily halted a lawsuit by a police officer against an activist associated with the Black Lives Matter movement and instructed the lower federal court (the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit) to seek clarification of state law from the Louisiana Supreme Court. [2]

  3. Ashcroft v. Iqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that plaintiffs must present a "plausible" cause of action. Alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (and together known as Twiqbal), Iqbal raised the threshold which plaintiffs needed to meet.

  4. Twiqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twiqbal

    Second, only a complaint that states a plausible claim for relief survives a motion to dismiss. Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief will, as the Court of Appeals observed, be a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.

  5. John Minor Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Minor_Wisdom_United...

    The John Minor Wisdom U.S. Court of Appeals Building originally housed a U.S. post office and both federal district and appeals courts. In 1908, the New York architectural firm Hale and Rogers won a design competition for the building, and U.S. Treasury Department officials approved their plans in 1909.

  6. False Claims Act of 1863 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act_of_1863

    The Fifth Circuit, [60] the Sixth Circuit, [61] the Seventh Circuit, [62] the Eighth Circuit, [63] the Tenth Circuit, [64] and the Eleventh Circuit [65] have all found that plaintiffs must allege specific false claims. In 2010, the First Circuit decision in U.S. ex rel. Duxbury v.

  7. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of...

    The Fifth Circuit gained appellate jurisdiction over the United States District Court for the Canal Zone. On October 1, 1981, under Pub. L. 96–452, the Fifth Circuit was split: Alabama, Georgia, and Florida were moved to the new Eleventh Circuit. On March 31, 1982, the Fifth Circuit lost jurisdiction over the Panama Canal Zone, which was ...

  8. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure.Authored by Justice David Souter, it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

  9. United States courts of appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_courts_of...

    The Tenth Circuit was created in 1929 by subdividing the existing Eighth Circuit, and the Eleventh Circuit was created in 1981 by subdividing the existing Fifth Circuit. The Federal Circuit was created in 1982 by the merger of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and the appellate division of the United States Court of Claims.