Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In microeconomics, economies of scale are the cost advantages that enterprises obtain due to their scale of operation, and are typically measured by the amount of output produced per unit of cost (production cost) . A decrease in cost per unit of output enables an increase in scale that is, increased production with lowered cost. [1]
In most countries, the difference between GDP and GNI are modest so that GDP can approximately be treated as total income of all the inhabitants as well, but in some countries, e.g. countries with very large net foreign assets (or debt), the difference may be considerable. [5]: 385
It is often referred to as the "top line" due to its position at the very top of the income statement. This is to be contrasted with the "bottom line" which denotes net income (gross revenues minus total expenses). [3] In general usage, revenue is the total amount of income by the sale of goods or services related to the company's operations.
If output increases by the same proportional change as all inputs change then there are constant returns to scale (CRS). For example, when inputs (labor and capital) increase by 100%, output increases by 100%. If output increases by less than the proportional change in all inputs, there are decreasing returns to scale (DRS). For example, when ...
In Marxian economics, surplus value is the difference between the amount raised through a sale of a product and the amount it cost to manufacture it: i.e. the amount raised through sale of the product minus the cost of the materials, plant and labour power.
9. Set up an annuity. An annuity can be a good place to set up reliable income. With a typical annuity, you make payments to an insurance company, which will provide you with a stream of income in ...
Non-GAAP income from operations for the third quarter was $131 million, $11 million above the high end of guidance, driven by increased revenues flowing through to the bottom line.
Large-scale ownership made considerable progress while foreign land companies accumulated millions of hectares. At the end of Porfirio Díaz 's dictatorship, 97% of arable land belonged to 1% of the population and 95% of peasants were landless, becoming farmworkers in huge haciendas or forming an impoverished urban proletariat whose revolts ...