Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
RATS: robusterrors option is available in many of the regression and optimization commands (linreg, nlls, etc.). Stata: robust option applicable in many pseudo-likelihood based procedures. [19] Gretl: the option --robust to several estimation commands (such as ols) in the context of a cross-sectional dataset produces robust standard errors. [20]
RATS is a powerful program, which can perform a range of econometric and statistical operations. The following is a list of the major procedures in econometrics and time series analysis that can be implemented in RATS. All these methods can be used in order to forecast, as well as to conduct data analysis.
This example calculates the five-number summary for the following set of observations: 0, 0, 1, 2, 63, 61, 27, 13. These are the number of moons of each planet in the Solar System. It helps to put the observations in ascending order: 0, 0, 1, 2, 13, 27, 61, 63.
[30] [31] In the 2006 review, all of the packages read either CSV files or Microsoft Excel format. All of the packages gave exactly the same results for correlation and regression. The free software packages also gave the same regression results as did excel. One of the main differences among the packages was how they handled missing data. With ...
This is because the FD estimator induces no serial correlation when differencing the errors. If u i t {\displaystyle u_{it}} follows a random walk , however, the FD estimator is more efficient as Δ u i t {\displaystyle \Delta u_{it}} are serially uncorrelated.
Gretl has its own scripting language, called hansl (which is a recursive acronym for Hansl's A Neat Scripting Language).. Hansl is a Turing-complete, interpreted programming language, featuring loops, conditionals, user-defined functions and complex data structures. [8]
In the book "SPSS For Dummies", the author discusses PSPP under the heading of "Ten Useful Things You Can Find on the Internet". [4] Another review of free to use statistical software also finds that the statistical results from PSPP match statistical results for SAS, for frequencies, means, correlation and regression.
The main difference between the two approaches is that the general linear model strictly assumes that the residuals will follow a conditionally normal distribution, [4] while the GLM loosens this assumption and allows for a variety of other distributions from the exponential family for the residuals. [2]