enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Felicific calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felicific_calculus

    The felicific calculus is an algorithm formulated by utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) for calculating the degree or amount of pleasure that a specific action is likely to induce. Bentham, an ethical hedonist , believed the moral rightness or wrongness of an action to be a function of the amount of pleasure or pain that it ...

  3. Ethical calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_calculus

    Generally, ethical calculus refers to any method of determining a course of action in a circumstance that is not explicitly evaluated in one's ethical code.. A formal philosophy of ethical calculus is a development in the study of ethics, combining elements of natural selection, self-organizing systems, emergence, and algorithm theory.

  4. Rational agent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_agent

    The idea of a rational agent is important to the philosophy of utilitarianism, as detailed by philosopher Jeremy Bentham's theory of the felicific calculus, also known as the hedonistic calculus. The action a rational agent takes depends on: the preferences of the agent; the agent's information of its environment, which may come from past ...

  5. Jeremy Bentham - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham

    In his exposition of the felicific calculus, Bentham proposed a classification of 12 pains and 14 pleasures, by which we might test the "happiness factor" of any action. [71] For Bentham, according to P. J. Kelly, the law "provides the basic framework of social interaction by delimiting spheres of personal inviolability within which individuals ...

  6. Preference utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference_utilitarianism

    However, 'beings' can also be extended to all sentient beings, even those who lack the capacity to contemplate long-term interests and consequences. [3] Since what is good and right depends solely on individual preferences, there can be nothing that is in itself good or bad: for preference utilitarians, the source of both morality and ethics in ...

  7. Hegseth faces senators' concerns not only about his behavior ...

    www.aol.com/hegseth-faces-senators-concerns-not...

    Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to be defense secretary, responds to reporters during a meeting with Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee ...

  8. On These Issues, Trump 2.0 Will Differ From Trump 1.0 - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/issues-trump-2-0-differ...

    But in some areas, Trump 2.0 is likely to look very different from Trump 1.0. After taking credit for spearheading the development of COVID-19 vaccines in 2020, Trump now plans to bring an anti ...

  9. Paradox of hedonism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_hedonism

    The paradox of hedonism, also called the pleasure paradox, refers to the practical difficulties encountered in the pursuit of pleasure.For the hedonist, constant pleasure-seeking may not yield the most actual pleasure or happiness in the long term when consciously pursuing pleasure interferes with experiencing it.

  1. Related searches felicific calculus ethics quizlet review questions 1 8 3 2 3x 9x 4 problems

    felicific calculus ethicsfelicific calculus hedonism
    the felicific calculusethical calculus bentham