Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In a report Sunday, the International Monetary Fund predicted that AI will affect almost 40% of jobs around the world, “replacing some and complementing others,” but potentially worsening ...
Take UPS, which said it is planning to cut 12,000 staff, and then warned that the jobs were unlikely to ever come back because it was starting to use AI to make pricing decisions and some back ...
AI could be used to gain an edge in decision-making by quickly analyzing large amounts of data and making decisions more quickly and effectively than humans. This could increase the speed and unpredictability of war, especially when accounting for automated retaliation systems. [56] [65]
Skeptics of the letter point out that AI has failed to reach certain milestones, such as predictions around self-driving cars. [4] Skeptics also argue that signatories of the letter were continuing funding of AI research. [3] Companies would benefit from public perception that AI algorithms were far more advanced than currently possible. [3]
The letter highlights both the positive and negative effects of artificial intelligence. [7] According to Bloomberg Business, Professor Max Tegmark of MIT circulated the letter in order to find common ground between signatories who consider super intelligent AI a significant existential risk, and signatories such as Professor Oren Etzioni, who believe the AI field was being "impugned" by a one ...
The head of one of the world’s biggest hedge funds has said artificial intelligence systems are unlikely to replace traders anytime soon. AI won’t be making decisions ‘anytime soon,’ says ...
AI as it is currently designed is well suited to alignment, Altman said. Because of that, he argues, it would be easier than it might seem to ensure AI does not harm humanity.
It is difficult for people to determine if such decisions are fair and trustworthy, leading potentially to bias in AI systems going undetected, or people rejecting the use of such systems. This has led to advocacy and in some jurisdictions legal requirements for explainable artificial intelligence. [69]