enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft...

    The United States DOJ's website on U.S. v. Microsoft; Microsoft's Antitrust Case, Microsoft News Center; Wired news timeline of the Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on 4th anniversary of Microsoft antitrust case; ZDnet story on proposed concessions; Antitrust & the Internet: Microsoft case archive "A Case of Insecure Browsing" by Andrew Chin.

  3. Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._AT&T_Corp.

    Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Supreme Court reversed a previous decision by the Federal Circuit and ruled in favor of Microsoft, holding that Microsoft was not liable for infringement on AT&T's patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f).

  4. Microsoft Corp. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United...

    The case, United States v. Microsoft Corp., was heard by the Court on February 27, 2018, with a ruling originally expected by the end of the Court's term in June 2018. [20] While the case was being decided by the Supreme Court, Congress introduced the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act ("CLOUD Act") shortly after the oral hearings ...

  5. Microsoft Corp. v. Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Commission

    Microsoft Corp. v. Commission (2007; T-201/04) is a case brought by the European Commission of the European Union (EU) against Microsoft for abuse of its dominant position in the market (according to competition law).

  6. Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniloc_USA,_Inc._v...

    The "25 percent rule of thumb" called for a 25 percent royalty rate when calculating patent infringement damages in cases exactly like those in Uniloc and Microsoft's case. [9] When Microsoft had challenged the 25 percent rule, the district court acknowledged the complexity of using the automatic 25 percent royalty in this case, but rejected ...

  7. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v...

    Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994), [1] was a copyright infringement lawsuit in which Apple Computer, Inc. (now Apple Inc.) sought to prevent Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard from using visual graphical user interface (GUI) elements that were similar to those in Apple's Lisa and Macintosh operating systems. [2]

  8. Microsoft v. MikeRoweSoft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._MikeRoweSoft

    The case, portrayed as a David versus Goliath struggle by the media, characterized Microsoft in a negative light. The resulting bad publicity was later described as a "public-relations mess". [12] [14] The public showing of support that Rowe received was credited with "softening Microsoft's stance", leading to an eventual settlement. [2]

  9. Criticism of Microsoft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft

    The Halloween documents, internal Microsoft memos which were leaked to the open source community beginning in 1998, indicate that some Microsoft employees perceive "open source" software — in particular, Linux — as a growing long-term threat to Microsoft's position in the software industry. The Halloween documents acknowledged that parts of ...