enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Research ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_ethics

    Research ethics is a discipline within the study of applied ethics. Its scope ranges from general scientific integrity and misconduct to the treatment of human and animal subjects. The social responsibilities of scientists and researchers are not traditionally included and are less well defined.

  3. Justice (research) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_(research)

    In research ethics, justice regards fairness in the distribution of burdens and benefits of research. For example, justice is a consideration in recruiting volunteer research participants, in considering any existing burdens the groups from which they are recruited face (such as historic marginalisation) and the risks of the research, alongside the potential benefits of the research.

  4. Belmont Report - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belmont_Report

    The Belmont Report is a 1978 report created by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Its full title is the Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.

  5. Defining Issues Test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defining_Issues_Test

    The Defining Issues Test is a proprietary self-report measure [4] which uses a Likert-type scale to give quantitative ratings and rankings to issues surrounding five different moral dilemmas, or stories. Specifically, respondents rate 12 issues in terms of their importance to the corresponding dilemma and then rank the four most important issues.

  6. Beneficence (ethics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beneficence_(ethics)

    One example illustrating this concept is the trolley problem. Morality and ethical theory allows for judging relative costs, so in the case when a harm to be inflicted in violating #1 is negligible and the harm prevented or benefit gained in #2–4 is substantial, then it may be acceptable to cause one harm to gain another benefit.

  7. Inclusion and exclusion criteria - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion_and_exclusion...

    Exclusion criteria concern properties of the study sample, defining reasons for which patients from the target population are to be excluded from the current study sample. Typical exclusion criteria are defined for either ethical reasons (e.g., children, pregnant women, patients with psychological illnesses, patients who are not able or willing ...

  8. Institutional review board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_review_board

    An institutional review board (IRB), also known as an independent ethics committee (IEC), ethical review board (ERB), or research ethics board (REB), is a committee at an institution that applies research ethics by reviewing the methods proposed for research involving human subjects, to ensure that the projects are ethical. The main goal of IRB ...

  9. Declaration of Helsinki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki

    The Declaration of Helsinki (DoH, Finnish: Helsingin julistus) is a set of ethical principles regarding human experimentation developed originally in 1964 for the medical community by the World Medical Association (WMA). [1] It is widely regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics. [1] [2] [3] [4]