Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Economic torts are tortious interference actions designed to protect trade or business. The area includes the doctrine of restraint of trade and, particularly in the United Kingdom, has largely been submerged in the twentieth century by statutory interventions on collective labour law and modern competition law, and certain laws governing intellectual property, particularly unfair competition law.
Lawsuit claims couple swindled $250,000 from Hibbing vulnerable adult, faults local bank for negligence Tribune Publishing Tom Olsen, Duluth News Tribune, Minn.
Bank of Montreal v Marcotte, 2014 SCC 55 is a ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada.Together with Amex Bank of Canada v.Adams, 2014 SCC 56 and Marcotte v. Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec, 2014 SCC 57 (collectively known as the "Marcotte trilogy"), [2] it represents a further development in Canadian constitutional jurisprudence on the doctrines of interjurisdictional immunity and ...
Most Americans are under the impression that most people can sue for any type of negligence, but it is untrue in most US jurisdictions (partly because negligence is one of the few torts for which ordinary people can and do obtain liability insurance.) [citation needed] It is a form of extracontractual liability that is based upon a failure to ...
I was talking recently to BBB spokeswoman Alison Southwick for another WalletPop story, and we drifted to another topic: the trend of banks being reported to the Better Business Bureau (complaints ...
Recovery for pure economic loss in English law, arising from negligence, has traditionally been limited. Notably, recovery for losses that are "purely economic" arise under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976; and for negligent misstatements, as stated in Hedley Byrne v. Heller. Economic loss generally refers to financial detriment that can be seen on ...
Comparative negligence – A partial defense that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can claim based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the damages. Most jurisdictions have adopted this doctrine; those not adopting it are Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, And Washington D.C.
Negligence (Lat. negligentia) [1] is a failure to exercise appropriate care expected to be exercised in similar circumstances. [2]Within the scope of tort law, negligence pertains to harm caused by the violation of a duty of care through a negligent act or failure to act.