enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miller v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California

    The Miller ruling, and particularly the resulting Miller test, was the Supreme Court's first comprehensive explication of obscene material that does not qualify for First Amendment protection and thus can be banned by governmental authorities. Furthermore, due to the three-part test's stringent requirements, very few types of content can now be ...

  3. Miller test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

    The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited. [1] [2]

  4. I know it when I see it - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

    The Supreme Court of the United States' rulings concerning obscenity in the public square have been unusually inconsistent. Though First Amendment free speech protections have always been taken into account, both Constitutional interpretationalists and originalists have limited this right to account for public sensibilities.

  5. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  6. A Constitutionally Dubious California Bill Would Ban ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/constitutionally-dubious...

    The proposal seems to conflict with a Supreme Court ruling against laws ... or scientific value," dispensing with the other two prongs of the obscenity test. In 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals ...

  7. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    The 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case Freedman v. Maryland ruled that prior restraint of film exhibition without a court order was unconstitutional, leading to the end of most state and local film censorship boards. Current laws that can be enforced after the fact are limited by the definition of "obscene" in the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision ...

  8. At stake in mifepristone case: abortion, FDA’s authority and ...

    www.aol.com/stake-mifepristone-case-abortion-fda...

    The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case on a abortion case that ... oversight and the resuscitation of an 1873 anti-obscenity law. ... ruling was put on hold while the Supreme Court considers the ...

  9. Defending Pornography in the Age of Safe Spaces: A Q&A With ...

    www.aol.com/news/defending-pornography-age-safe...

    In all these cases, including in the most recent case in which the Supreme Court reaffirmed the completely court-manufactured obscenity exception—it's an old decision that goes back to 1973, but ...