Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity as material that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". [1]
Case name Citation Date decided Gilligan v. Morgan: 413 U.S. 1: 1973: Miller v. California: 413 U.S. 15: 1973: Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton: 413 U.S. 49
The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited.
412 U.S. 669 (1973) Standing to sue Miller v. California: 413 U.S. 15 (1973) Freedom of speech, Miller test for obscenity: United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film: 413 U.S. 123 (1973) Ban on importing obscene material stands but material to be reevaluated under Miller test Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations: 413 ...
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973), is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court which upheld an ordinance enacted in Pittsburgh that forbids sex-designated classified advertising for job opportunities, against a claim by the parent company of the Pittsburgh Press that the ordinance violated its First Amendment rights.
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) United States , 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v. California , was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment . [ 1 ]
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) United States , 383 U.S. 463 (1966), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of the First Amendment to Federal obscenity laws . One of a trio of cases (with Memoirs v.
Heller v. New York, 413 U.S. 483 (1973), was a United States Supreme Court decision which upheld that states could make laws limiting the distribution of obscene material, provided that these laws were consistent with the Miller test for obscene material established by the Supreme Court in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). [1]