Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Book cover of the 1979 paperback edition. Hubert Dreyfus was a critic of artificial intelligence research. In a series of papers and books, including Alchemy and AI, What Computers Can't Do (1972; 1979; 1992) and Mind over Machine, he presented a pessimistic assessment of AI's progress and a critique of the philosophical foundations of the field.
Uncanny valley of the mind or AI: Due to rapid advancements in the areas of artificial intelligence and affective computing, cognitive scientists have also suggested the possibility of an "uncanny valley of mind". [29] [30] Accordingly, people might experience strong feelings of aversion if they encounter highly advanced, emotion-sensitive ...
Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control is a 2019 non-fiction book by computer scientist Stuart J. Russell. It asserts that the risk to humanity from advanced artificial intelligence (AI) is a serious concern despite the uncertainty surrounding future progress in AI. It also proposes an approach to the AI control ...
And like it or not (for the record, we don’t) journalism has been at the top of many of those lists. ... Some people believe that AI could eventually replace human journalists, but many experts ...
AI as it is currently designed is well suited to alignment, Altman said. Because of that, he argues, it would be easier than it might seem to ensure AI does not harm humanity.
The letter highlights both the positive and negative effects of artificial intelligence. [7] According to Bloomberg Business, Professor Max Tegmark of MIT circulated the letter in order to find common ground between signatories who consider super intelligent AI a significant existential risk, and signatories such as Professor Oren Etzioni, who believe the AI field was being "impugned" by a one ...
"It wasn't like mind control, just, you know, making people do whatever it wants," Rand said. "It was essentially following facts." Researchers who weren't involved in the study called it a ...
AI and AI ethics researchers Timnit Gebru, Emily M. Bender, Margaret Mitchell, and Angelina McMillan-Major have argued that discussion of existential risk distracts from the immediate, ongoing harms from AI taking place today, such as data theft, worker exploitation, bias, and concentration of power. [137]