enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. In re Himmel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Himmel

    In 1988, 154 attorneys were reported for misconduct in Illinois. In 1989, 922 attorneys were reported for misconduct. [5] Often cited discussion of the Himmel rule are by Richard W. Burke in 3 Geo.J.Legal Ethics 643 (1989-1990) and by Bruce Green in 39 William & Mary Law Review pp. 357–392 (vol. 39, issue 2), although the case has been cited ...

  3. Hale v. Committee on Character and Fitness for the State of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hale_v._Committee_on...

    Hale v. Committee on Character and Fitness for the State of Illinois, 335 F.3d 678 (7th Cir. 2003), was a decision made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in which the court refused on procedural grounds to disturb the Illinois Committee on Character of Fitness's denial of a license to practice law to Matthew F. Hale, on the ground that he lacked the moral character ...

  4. Illinois Compiled Statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Compiled_Statutes

    Additions, deletions, and changes to the ILCS are done through the Illinois Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB), which files the changes as provided for by Public Act 87-1005. [3] The compilation is an official compilation by the state and is entirely in the public domain for purposes of federal copyright law; anyone may publish the statutes. [3]

  5. Pickering v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickering_v._Board_of...

    Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the absence of proof of the teacher knowingly or recklessly making false statements the teacher had a right to speak on issues of public importance without being dismissed from their position. [1]

  6. Terminiello v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminiello_v._City_of_Chicago

    Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a "breach of peace" ordinance of the City of Chicago that banned speech that "stirs the public to anger, invites dispute, brings about a condition of unrest, or creates a disturbance" was unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States ...

  7. The end of cash bail and more: What's in Illinois' SAFE-T Act?

    www.aol.com/news/end-cash-bail-more-whats...

    Through the SAFE-T Act, a criminal justice reform bill, the end of cash bail will begin in less than three months. Some resistance, however, remains.

  8. Imminent lawless action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

    These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. [4]

  9. Chicago Appeals Court rules in favor of Illinois gun ban ...

    www.aol.com/chicago-appeals-court-rules-favor...

    CHICAGO (WTVO) — A federal appeals court in Chicago ruled that the Illinois assault weapon ban can remain in effect while the law is debated. This decision came on Thursday as lawyers ...