Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Marx believed that humanity's defining characteristic was its means of production and thus the only way for man to free himself from oppression was for him to take control of the means of production. According to Marx, this is the goal of history and the elements of the superstructure act as tools of history.
We should study Marxist books, but [this study] must be integrated with our country's actual conditions. We need books, but we must overcome book worship, which is divorced from the actual situation." [1]: 96 In this view, Marxism–Leninism requires theory to be tied to local conditions through revolutionary practice. [3]: 37
In Marx's Concept of Man, Erich Fromm provides a detailed analysis of Karl Marx's ideas about human nature and how those ideas informed his economic and political theories. Fromm shows how Marx's conception of man as a "species-being" who is fundamentally social and cooperative, rather than selfish and individualistic, shaped his vision of a ...
As an author of both specialist and general books in the areas of literary theory, Marxism and Catholicism, Eagleton saw the historical moment as appropriate for Why Marx Was Right; critics said that the book was part of a resurgence in Marxist thought after the 2007–2008 financial crisis. It was first published in 2011 and reprinted in 2018 ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... Pages in category "Books about Marxism" The following 51 pages are in this category, out of ...
Manufacturing Consent (Burawoy book) Marx's Theory of Ideology; Marxism and the National Question; Marxism and the Oppression of Women; Marxism: An Historical and Critical Study; The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions; The Meaning of Marxism; Monopoly Capital
Canadian hockey player Matthew Petgrave has begun crowdfunding to help cover his legal fees in connection with the death of fellow hockey player Adam Johnson.. Johnson, who played for the ...
McLellan praised KoĊakowski for the thoroughness of his philosophical discussion of Marx. [15] Mixed evaluations of the book include those of the Marxist historian G. E. M. de Ste. Croix and the historian of science Roger Smith. [16] [17] De Ste. Croix considered the book overpraised, but nevertheless acknowledged that he was influenced by it.