enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fact–value distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factvalue_distinction

    Statements of value (normative or prescriptive statements), which encompass ethics and aesthetics, and are studied via axiology. This barrier between fact and value, as construed in epistemology, implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter. [2]

  3. Value judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_judgment

    A value judgment (or normative judgement) is a judgment of the rightness or wrongness of something or someone, or of the usefulness of something or someone, based on a comparison or other relativity. As a generalization, a value judgment can refer to a judgment based upon a particular set of values or on a particular value system. A related ...

  4. Language, Truth, and Logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language,_Truth,_and_Logic

    Value-judgments are not analytic, and are not verifiable as 'matters of fact.' According to Ayer when we argue about whether a value-judgment is right or wrong, we are really arguing about the empirical facts on which a value-judgment is based, or about the logical interpretation of empirical facts.

  5. Positive and normative economics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_and_normative...

    An example of a normative economic statement is as follows: The price of milk should be $6 a gallon to give dairy farmers a higher standard of living. This is a normative statement, because it reflects value judgments; this specific statement makes the judgment that the benefits of the policy outweigh its costs. [2]

  6. Normativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normativity

    There is large debate in philosophy surrounding whether one can get a normative statement of such a type from an empirical one (i.e. whether one can get an 'ought' from an 'is', or a 'value' from a 'fact'). Aristotle is one scholar who believed that one could in fact get an ought from an is.

  7. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Moralistic fallacy – inferring factual conclusions from evaluative premises, in violation of fact-value distinction; e.g. making statements about what is, on the basis of claims about what ought to be. This is the inverse of the naturalistic fallacy.

  8. Criteria of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criteria_of_truth

    If an idea works then it must be true, to the Pragmatist. The consequences of applying a concept reveal its truth value upon examination of the results. The full meaning of an idea is self-apparent in its application. For example, the therapeutic value and effect of penicillin in relation to infections is proven in its administration.

  9. Metaethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaethics

    In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, ground, and meaning of moral judgment, ethical belief, or values.It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually contentious, situations).