Ad
related to: tampon applicator vs non medical disability qualifications cost comparison
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Tampons with plastic applicators are typically the most beginner-friendly and comfortable to insert. But if this isn’t a concern for you, cardboard and applicator-free tampons typically serve as ...
In 1984, an advertisement for o.b. tampons aired on American television with the inventor Esser-Mittag. The o.b. tampon was marketed with a large emphasis on its comfort and lack of an applicator. It was reasoned that the o.b. tampon was a smarter alternative to tampons with applicators. [9]
Applicator tampon. Tampon design varies between companies and across product lines in order to offer a variety of applicators, materials and absorbencies. [6] There are two main categories of tampons based on the way of insertion – digital tampons inserted by finger, and applicator tampons.
The idea for a tampon which could be inserted without a separate applicator was initiated in 1947 by the German auto engineer Carl Hahn and the lawyer Heinz Mittag. They wanted to introduce tampons to the German market, but the cardboard used for the applicator in the American tampon product Tampax, which at the time dominated the market, was unavailable in post-war Germany.
One cup may be reusable for up to 10 years, making their long-term cost lower than that of disposable tampons or pads, though the initial cost is higher. As menstrual cups are reusable, they generate less solid waste than tampons and pads, both from the products themselves and from their packaging. [14]
Non-tax qualified (NTQ) was formerly called traditional long-term care insurance. It often includes a "trigger" called a "medical necessity" trigger. This means that the patient's own doctor, or that doctor in conjunction with someone from the insurance company, can state that the patient needs care for any medical reason and the policy will pay.
Louis W. Sullivan, the Secretary of Health and Human Services at the time, criticized the plan by stating that "Oregon's plan in substantial part values the life of a person with a disability less than the life of a person without a disability." [11]
With occupational licensing varying by state, another channel through which licensing can affect employment is through reduced mobility. The patchwork of regulations raises the cost of cross-state mobility for workers in these occupations. This will result in slower adjustment costs to regional economic shocks which can result in higher ...
Ad
related to: tampon applicator vs non medical disability qualifications cost comparison