Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The offender is able to calculate whether the pain or severity of the likely punishment outweighs the gain or benefit of getting away with the crime. [ 3 ] Other assumptions relate to the concept of marginal deterrence , based on the belief that it is prudent to punish a more severe crime more severely than a lesser crime and a series of crimes ...
A thrill killing is premeditated or random murder that is motivated by the sheer excitement of the act. [1] While there have been attempts to categorize multiple murders, such as identifying "thrill killing" as a type of "hedonistic mass killing", [2] actual details of events frequently overlap category definitions making attempts at such distinctions problematic.
Retributive justice is a legal concept whereby the criminal offender receives punishment proportional or similar to the crime.As opposed to revenge, retribution—and thus retributive justice—is not personal, is directed only at wrongdoing, has inherent limits, involves no pleasure at the suffering of others (i.e., schadenfreude, sadism), and employs procedural standards.
Catecholamine hormones, such as adrenaline or noradrenaline, facilitate immediate physical reactions associated with a preparation for violent muscular action. Although the flight-or-fight-response normally ends with the removal of the threat, the constant mortal danger in combat zones likewise constantly and acutely stresses soldiers.
Crime displacement is the relocation of crime (or criminals) as a result of police crime-prevention efforts. Crime displacement has been linked to problem-oriented policing, but it may occur at other levels and for other reasons. Community-development efforts may be a reason why criminals move to other areas for their criminal activity.
Without a driver, the perpetrator may make errors due to the stress associated with the crime, or lack of ability to multi-task (such as leaving the car keys at the scene of the crime); [4] a murderer needs to "think strategically" to get away with murder—to "mislead police, stage crime scenes and destroy evidence." [18]
On the first day of his testimony, Travis testified that (1) crime had increased in the neighborhood in the months before the shooting, but he did not have complete information on who committed the crimes; [186] (2) he was aware that items were stolen from the boat at his neighbor's under-construction property, and that he knew that "several ...
The case is widely known for originally stimulating social psychological research into the "bystander effect". According to a sensationalized article in The New York Times , 38 witnesses watched the stabbings but did not intervene or even call the police until after the attacker fled and Genovese had died.