enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Illinois Department of Human Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Department_of...

    The Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) is the code department [1] [2] of the Illinois state government that administers the Illinois Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination with respect to employment, financial credit, public accommodations and real estate transactions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including sexual harassment), national origin, ancestry, military ...

  3. Illinois Illinois Constitution, Article I, §18 (1970) Jett Hawkins Act (2021) Homeless Bill of Rights; Iowa Iowa Constitution, Article I, §1 (1998) Louisiana Louisiana Constitution, Article I, §3 (1975) CROWN Act (2023) Maine 2012 Maine Question 1; CROWN Act (2022) Maryland Maryland Constitution, Declaration of Rights, Article 46 (1972)

  4. Anti-discrimination law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-discrimination_law

    The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 was the first major anti-discrimination legislation passed in Australia, aimed at prohibiting discrimination based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. [12] Jurisdictions within Australia moved shortly after to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, through acts including the Equal Opportunity Act ...

  5. Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandy_v_Human_Rights_and...

    (7:0) The 1992 and 1993 amendments to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 purported to vest judicial power in the Commission contrary to Ch III of the Constitution and hence were invalid. Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission ( HREOC ) was a case before the High Court of Australia determining that the HREOC could not validly ...

  6. Washington v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Davis

    A plaintiff must prove discriminatory motive on the part of the state actor to receive redress under the Constitution, not just discriminatory impact. It held a "disproportionate impact is not irrelevant, but it is not the sole touchstone of an invidious racial discrimination forbidden by the Constitution."

  7. Evanston, Illinois, faces lawsuit over reparations payments ...

    www.aol.com/news/evanston-illinois-faces-lawsuit...

    A conservative activist group filed a class action lawsuit against a reparations program in Evanston, Illinois, claiming the initiative is unconstitutional because qualification for the program is ...

  8. Judicial aspects of race in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_aspects_of_race...

    Collier Supreme Court ruling to end racial segregation in prisons, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (1975), and measures to end mortgage discrimination, prohibited de jure racial segregation and discrimination in the US. The Immigration Act of 1965 discontinued some quotas based on national origin, with preference given to those who have US ...

  9. Racial discrimination in jury selection - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_discrimination_in...

    Racial discrimination in jury selection is specifically prohibited by law in many jurisdictions throughout the world. In the United States, it has been defined through a series of judicial decisions. [1] However, juries composed solely of one racial group are legal in the United States and other countries.