Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Murthy v. Missouri (originally filed as Missouri v. Biden) was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States involving the First Amendment, the federal government, and social media. The states of Missouri and Louisiana, led by Missouri's then Attorney General Eric Schmitt, filed suit against the U.S. government in the Western District of ...
Murthy v. Missouri involves a suit against the Biden Administration alleging that it coerced and encouraged social media platforms to take down false speech, including about COVID vaccines and the ...
In October, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear our bombshell censorship case, Missouri v. Biden, in which we alleged — and proved — a conspiracy by government officials to silence ...
On Wednesday, in Murthy vs. Missouri, the court considered a suit brought by two state governments and five social media users against the Biden administration and many federal agencies, claiming ...
During colonial times, English speech regulations were rather restrictive.The English criminal common law of seditious libel made criticizing the government a crime. Lord Chief Justice John Holt, writing in 1704–1705, explained the rationale for the prohibition: "For it is very necessary for all governments that the people should have a good opinion of it."
595 U.S. ___ Argued January 7, 2022. Decided January 13, 2022. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), acting under the direction of President Biden, issued an emergency rule requiring all employers with at least 100 employees to ensure that their employees had either been vaccinated for COVID-19 or show a negative test for ...
Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Missouri Republican who brought the case as attorney general, says Murthy v. Missouri is the most important First Amendment case in a generation.
This category includes court cases that deal with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, providing that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."