Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
However, some states denied the existence of the creamy layer, and a report commissioned by the supreme court was not implemented. The case was pressed again in 1999 and the supreme court reaffirmed the creamy layer exclusion and extended it to SCs and STs. [8] General Manager Southern Railway v. Rangachari AIR 1962 SC 36, State of Punjab v ...
A two-member bench consisting Justice Kuldip Singh and Justice R. M. Sahai gave the judgment of the case on 30 July 1992 (1992 AIR 1858). [2] For the first time in the post independent India, right to education of the Indian citizens and the State obligation to secure the right came under scrutiny at the premises of the apex court .
Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan, AC (15 March 1977 – 28 November 2008) was an Indian Army officer, who was serving in the 51 Special Action Group of the National Security Guard on deputation. He was killed in action during the 2008 Mumbai attacks [ 2 ] and was posthumously awarded the Ashoka Chakra , India's highest peacetime gallantry award, on ...
Main menu. Main menu. move to sidebar hide. ... Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Ambika Unnikrishnan: Children: Remya Unnikrishnan, Reshma ...
This in-turn led to formulation of the 1st amendment of the Constitution of India which clarified public order can form grounds for reasonable restrictions of free speech. Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh [4] 1977 Right to propagate religion does not include the right to convert by force, fraud or allurement. Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano ...
Kunhikrishnan is the younger son of Malayalam actor Unnikrishnan Namboothiri and Leela Antharjanam. [6] His siblings are Devi (Wife of the noted lyricist and musician Kaithapram Damodaran Namboothiri), Bhavadasan and Yamuna.
This case overturned a previous ruling Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi versus Union of India by Delhi High Court Government of NCT of Delhi versus Union of India & Another [ C. A. No. 2357 of 2017] is a civil appeal heard before the Supreme Court of India by a five-judge constitution bench of the court.
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is an Indian public interest litigation case challenging the Ninety-third Constitutional Amendment and the Central Educational Institutions(CEIs) (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006. [1]