Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is a list of Wikipedia articles deemed controversial because they are constantly re-edited in a circular manner, or are otherwise the focus of edit warring or article sanctions. This page is conceived as a location for articles that regularly become biased and need to be fixed, or articles that were once the subject of an NPOV dispute and ...
Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research. A Lancet review on Handling of Scientific Misconduct in Scandinavian countries gave examples of policy definitions. In Denmark, scientific misconduct is defined as "intention [al ...
List of Wikipedia controversies. John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. [ 1 ] Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies.
Scientific controversy. Sustained scientific debate, sometimes scientific controversy[1] or persistent disagreement, [2] is any a substantial disagreement among scientists. A scientific controversy may involve issues such as the interpretation of data, which ideas are most supported by evidence, and which ideas are most worth pursuing.
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that allows its users to write and edit articles via wiki software, which also allows users to revert each other's edits. Disputes on Wikipedia between editors, concerning content within articles, may give rise to edit wars , in which a repeated exchange of opposing edits is published on a contested article.
See also: Wikipedia:Neutral point of viewand Wikipedia:Don't teach the controversy. An article about a controversial person, issue, group or organization should start with facts: "According to the FBI, the XYZ faction had over 1,000 active members in 1982.[1]" Next, the article should accurately describe their views, no matter how misguided or ...
This is a list of statements by major scientific organizations about climate change, that have issued formal statements of opinion, classifies those organizations according to whether they concur with the IPCC view (i.e. the scientific consensus on climate change), are non-committal, or dissent from it. The California Governor's Office website ...
Later, the article was restored by another Wikipedia contributor who lived outside France, in Switzerland. [127] [128] As a result of the controversy, the article became the most read page on the French Wikipedia, [129] with over 120,000 page views during the weekend of 6–7 April 2013. [130] It was translated into multiple other languages. [131]