enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. textual criticism - What text(s) do modern scholars use to...

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/25121/what-texts...

    The 1550 Textus Receptus (TR), which is the text upon which the King James Version is based; The Majority Text (M), based on what the majority of manuscripts say any given verse should be. The New King James Version translation uses the Textus Receptus, but footnotes each verse where there is a different Greek reading in the CT or M.

  3. What Greek mss (SBLGNT, MGNT and TR) or textual criticism...

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/91442/what-greek...

    With the publication (1881) of Wescott and Hort text based on the vast number of new and ancient MSS, many new versions based on it appeared. This text was subsequently updated and revised many time as new discoveries were made and has become known as the Nestle-Arland text, now known as NA28 or USB5. [The SBLGNT is essentially the same text.]

  4. How to explain the differences in Matthew 19:16-17 translations?

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/71619

    The KJV text represent the bad textual tradition of Textus Receptus whose mss dated from the 12th Century or later, and only one came from outside the mainstream Byzantine tradition. Consequently, most modern scholars consider his text to be of dubious quality. The notorious Byzantine or Syrian text type is a very late and bad in quality.

  5. Textus Receptus vs. Critical Text - Bible - KJV or Modern Version...

    onlinebaptist.com/.../2805-textus-receptus-vs-critical-text

    The Alexandrian is a text type (as is the Byzantine). The documents contained in the Alexandrian text type are the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. The Byzantine text type is the majority or received text. The septuagint is a greek translation of the Old Testament.

  6. textual criticism - What manuscripts did people use to create the...

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/24706/what...

    Dr. Robinson also explains the key differences between the Critical Text (e.g. NIV) and the Textus Receptus (KJV): The user should note that the Stephens 1550 TR edition does not agree with modern critical editions such as that published by the United Bible Societies or the various Nestle editions.

  7. Why did Textus Receptus add "prōtotokos" in Matthew 1:25, or why...

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/70622

    First of all, the Text Receptus (received texts) is older than the recent NU (which is something modern), however this last text (NU) uses older texts than the former. The Textus Receptus traces back the year 1516. The following verse (Matthews 1:25) is present in this edition of (after 12th century), which is:

  8. Is there a Textual Issue with Ephesians 3:9?

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/76846

    The words, by Jesus Christ (A.V.), are not found in a great preponderance of textual authorities. SUMMARY The majority of the critical Greek texts do not have the phrase "by Jesus Christ" in Ephesians 3:9. The Codex Sinaiticus, one of the oldest and most authoritative Greek manuscripts in the world, does not have the phrase "by Jesus Christ" in ...

  9. textual criticism - How authentic is Codex Sinaiticus? - Biblical...

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/4091

    Codex Sinaiticus was made in the 4th century on parchment using capital letters (a manuscript in all capitals is called an "uncial"). It was discovered in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript. Codex Sinaiticus is considered by most textual scholars of the New Testament to be the best complete manuscript.

  10. Coherence-Based Genealogical Method vs. Local Text-Types Theory

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/2896

    The constructed text of an edition represents the hypothetical reconstruction of the initial text.” ([Editio Critica Maior] 2 Peter, 23) This edition helpfully acknowledges that reproducing an “autograph” of any New Testament writing is an impossible task, given available evidence.

  11. Date of appearance of the New Testament in Syriac (Peshitta)

    hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/9297

    One argument says that the version Peshitta used as base text the Textus Receptus for the New Testament and such translation was made in around the year 150. This argument suggests that the Textus Receptus is older than the critical text.

  1. Related searches critical text vs textus receptus

    majority text vs critical text vs textus receptus