enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ad hominem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

    Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious.Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself.

  3. Tone policing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing

    A tone argument (also called tone policing) is a type of ad hominem aimed at the tone of an argument instead of its factual or logical content in order to dismiss a person's argument. Ignoring the truth or falsity of a statement, a tone argument instead focuses on the emotion with which it is expressed.

  4. Argument from authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

    This argument is a form of genetic fallacy; in which the conclusion about the validity of a statement is justified by appealing to the characteristics of the person who is speaking, such as also in the ad hominem fallacy. [17] For this argument, Locke coined the term argumentum ad verecundiam (appeal to shamefacedness/modesty) because it ...

  5. Appeal to motive - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_motive

    Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. [1] It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument is an informal fallacy. [citation needed]

  6. Tu quoque - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

    Tu quoque [a] is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical. This specious reasoning is a special type of ad hominem attack.

  7. Bulverism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulverism

    Bulverism is a type of ad hominem rhetorical fallacy that combines circular reasoning and the genetic fallacy with presumption or condescension. The Bulverist assumes a speaker's argument is invalid or false and then explains why the speaker came to make that mistake or to be so silly (even if the opponent's claim is actually right) by ...

  8. Wikipedia : Rational debate

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rational_debate

    1. Thou shall not attack a person's character but the argument itself. ("Ad hominem") 2. Thou shall not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. ("Straw Man Fallacy) 3. Thou shall not use small numbers to represent the whole. ("Hasty Generalization") 4.

  9. Whataboutism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

    From a logical and argumentative point of view, whataboutism is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.