enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: car dealers illegal charges in california state court los angeles case search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  3. Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_v._Yellow_Cab_Co.

    Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975), commonly referred to simply as Li, is a California Supreme Court case that judicially embraced comparative negligence in California tort law and rejected strict contributory negligence.

  4. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    Motion to suppress denied; reversed, California Court of Appeal; reversed, 136 P.3d 845 (Cal. 2006); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1177 (2007). Holding; Automobile passengers are "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the car in which they are riding is held at a law enforcement traffic stop. California Supreme Court vacated and ...

  5. 4 Sneaky Car Dealership Scams That Might Be Illegal in 2025 - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/4-sneaky-car-dealership...

    Under CARS, this bait and switch on pricing, discounts, rebates and inventory would be 100% illegal. Dealers could not falsely advertise to pull one over on you. Feeding You Junk Fees

  6. General Motors streetcar conspiracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_streetcar...

    The General Motors streetcar conspiracy refers to the convictions of General Motors (GM) and related companies that were involved in the monopolizing of the sale of buses and supplies to National City Lines (NCL) and subsidiaries, as well as to the allegations that the defendants conspired to own or control transit systems, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

  7. Ker v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ker_v._California

    The Court extended that holding in this case, addressing the standard for deciding what are the fruits of an illegal search in state criminal trials. Clark's opinion addressed “the specific question as to whether Mapp requires the exclusion of evidence in this case which the California District Court of Appeal has held to be lawfully seized ...

  8. California Dealers Seek to Torpedo Scout Motors' Direct ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/california-dealers-seek...

    The California New Car Dealers Association believes VW Group's involvement with Scout Motors legally restricts direct-sale practices in the state following a 2023 amendment.

  9. Case against D.A. advisor will move forward to trial on six ...

    www.aol.com/news/case-against-d-advisor-move...

    Superior Court Judge Sam Ohta, pictured in 2023, tossed out two felony charges against Diana Teran and ruled the case will move forward on six others. (Irfan Khan/Los Angeles Times)

  1. Ad

    related to: car dealers illegal charges in california state court los angeles case search