Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Under CARS, this bait and switch on pricing, discounts, rebates and inventory would be 100% illegal. Dealers could not falsely advertise to pull one over on you. Feeding You Junk Fees
The laws against direct sales arose historically in the United States starting in the 1930s, as automobile manufacturers started using independently franchised dealerships to offload the tasks of retail selling and servicing vehicles. [38] The laws have been actively defended into the 21st century and extended to online in-state sales.
A ruling from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday has struck down Biden-era consumer protections related to car buying, after a brief legal challenge to the rules from the National ...
A felony crime is a more serious crime where the punishment of death or imprisonment in a state prison is annexed. [15] A person found guilty of a felony can also be granted probation instead of a prison sentence. [16] If a person is granted probation with Imposition of Sentence Suspended, the California Supreme Court in four different cases ...
Motion to suppress denied; reversed, California Court of Appeal; reversed, 136 P.3d 845 (Cal. 2006); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1177 (2007). Holding; Automobile passengers are "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the car in which they are riding is held at a law enforcement traffic stop. California Supreme Court vacated and ...
The California New Car Dealers Association believes VW Group's involvement with Scout Motors legally restricts direct-sale practices in the state following a 2023 amendment.
Robert Rivas, Speaker of the California State Assembly from AD-29 [34] Phil Ting, AD-19 [36] Chris Ward, AD-78 [36] Lori Wilson, AD-11 [36] Local officials. Diana Becton, Contra Costa County District Attorney [39] George Gascon, Los Angeles County District Attorney [40] Eunisses Hernandez, member of the Los Angeles City Council from the 1st ...
The General Motors streetcar conspiracy refers to the convictions of General Motors (GM) and related companies that were involved in the monopolizing of the sale of buses and supplies to National City Lines (NCL) and subsidiaries, as well as to the allegations that the defendants conspired to own or control transit systems, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.