Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
DB Class 101; DB Class 103; DB Class 111; DB Class 120; DB Class 151; DB Class E 10; DB Class E 40; DB Class E 41; DB Class E 50; DB Class E 410; DBAG Class 128; DBAG Class 145 and 146; DR Class 243; DR Class 250; DR Class 252; DR Class E 11; DR Class E 42; DR Class E 251; DRG Class E 16; DRG Class E 18; DRG Class E 19; DRG Class E 77; DRG ...
As all other types of the Einheitslokomotiven program, the class E 10 / class 110 had 2-axle pivoted bogies/trucks as welded box construction with pivot pins, and welded superstructure with fan grills. The class 110.3 used the body of the E 10.12 with the pulled-forward frontal area, also called the “crease” (Bügelfalte).
Originally designed as an effective means of traction for light passenger trains, and with a top speed of 120 kilometres per hour (75 mph) [2] and an axle load below 17 tonnes (16.7 long tons; 18.7 short tons), class E 41 was also designated for passenger services on smaller lines. In the 1950s, due to general lack of locomotives, class E 41 ...
This page was last edited on 12 October 2022, at 14:10 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Curious about the most expensive items sold on eBay? From a gigayacht to a U.S. town, here are 10 of the most extravagant listings we could find. ... Sold for: $2.1 million.
The Class 22 were passenger train locomotives with the Deutsche Reichsbahn in East Germany, that were converted from former 39.0-2 engines between 1958 and 1962, as part of the reconstruction programme and were renumbered in 1970 under the new computer-generated numbering scheme back to Class 39.10.
The VT 11.5 was based on the prewar DRG Class SVT 137 and the innovative designs by Franz Kruckenberg [2] as well as on the experiences with the postwar DB Class VT 10.5. [3] Mostly the trainsets consisted of two motor units built by MAN AG, one dining and kitchen car, one dining and bar car built by Wegmann & Co. , and three coaches assembled ...
The design, produced by Friedrich Wilhelm Eckhardt (1892–1961), differed from the DRG's original requirement for a 2-8-0 (1 ′ D) engine, because the required performance with an 18-ton axle load was easier to generate on a 2-8-2 engine rather than one with a 2-8-0 wheel configuration. Continued adherence to this instruction would in the end ...