enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Precision and recall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall

    To calculate the recall for a given class, we divide the number of true positives by the prevalence of this class (number of times that the class occurs in the data sample). The class-wise precision and recall values can then be combined into an overall multi-class evaluation score, e.g., using the macro F1 metric. [21]

  3. F-score - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-score

    Precision and recall. In statistical analysis of binary classification and information retrieval systems, the F-score or F-measure is a measure of predictive performance. It is calculated from the precision and recall of the test, where the precision is the number of true positive results divided by the number of all samples predicted to be positive, including those not identified correctly ...

  4. Evaluation measures (information retrieval) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_measures...

    Two other commonly used F measures are the measure, which weights recall twice as much as precision, and the measure, which weights precision twice as much as recall. The F-measure was derived by van Rijsbergen (1979) so that F β {\displaystyle F_{\beta }} "measures the effectiveness of retrieval with respect to a user who attaches β ...

  5. File:Precision and recall.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Precision_and_recall.pdf

    You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

  6. Positive and negative predictive values - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_and_negative...

    The positive predictive value (PPV), or precision, is defined as = + = where a "true positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a positive result under the gold standard, and a "false positive" is the event that the test makes a positive prediction, and the subject has a negative result under the gold standard.

  7. Accuracy paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_paradox

    Even though the accuracy is ⁠ 10 + 999000 / 1000000 ⁠ ≈ 99.9%, 990 out of the 1000 positive predictions are incorrect. The precision of ⁠ 10 / 10 + 990 ⁠ = 1% reveals its poor performance. As the classes are so unbalanced, a better metric is the F1 score = ⁠ 2 × 0.01 × 1 / 0.01 + 1 ⁠ ≈ 2% (the recall being ⁠ 10 + 0 / 10 ...

  8. Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision

    Commonly used metrics include the notions of precision and recall. In this context, precision is defined as the fraction of documents correctly retrieved compared to the documents retrieved (true positives divided by true positives plus false positives), using a set of ground truth relevant results selected by humans. Recall is defined as the ...

  9. Phi coefficient - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phi_coefficient

    In statistics, the phi coefficient (or mean square contingency coefficient and denoted by φ or r φ) is a measure of association for two binary variables.. In machine learning, it is known as the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and used as a measure of the quality of binary (two-class) classifications, introduced by biochemist Brian W. Matthews in 1975.