enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

    The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

  3. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant, [ 10 ] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories ...

  4. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    A GitHub study in 2015 on their statistical data found that the MIT license was the most prominent FOSS license on that platform. [ 38 ] In June 2016 an analysis of the Fedora Project 's packages showed as most used licenses the GPL family, followed by MIT, BSD, the LGP family, Artistic (for Perl packages), LPPL (for texlive packages), and ASL.

  5. License compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility

    License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.

  6. BSD licenses - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses

    The BSD license is a simple license that merely requires that all code retain the BSD license notice if redistributed in source code format, or reproduce the notice if redistributed in binary format. The BSD license (unlike some other licenses e.g. GPL ) does not require that source code be distributed at all.

  7. Software relicensing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_relicensing

    An early example of an open-source project that did successfully re-license for license compatibility reasons is the Mozilla project and their Firefox browser. The source code of Netscape's Communicator 4.0 browser was originally released in 1998 under the Netscape Public License/Mozilla Public License [6] but was criticised by the FSF and OSI for being incompatible.

  8. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. WTFPL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

    The license was confirmed as a GPL-compatible free software license by the Free Software Foundation, but its use is "not recommended". [1] In 2009, the Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license due to redundancy with the Fair License. [2] The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license. [14]

  1. Related searches most restrictive license github example project plan overview report

    most restrictive license github example project plan overview report template