enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file pdf version

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]

  3. File:Sidelights on the Bible (IA sidelightsonbibl00leef).pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sidelights_on_the...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  4. Anti-Marcionite prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Marcionite_Prologues

    The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]

  5. File:The Bible and modern life (IA biblemodernlife00cooprich).pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Bible_and_modern...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  6. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Alexandrian text-type is one of the main text types. It is the text type favored by the majority of modern textual critics and it is the basis for most modern (after 1900) Bible translations. Over 5,800 New Testament manuscripts have been classified into four groups by text type.

  7. Q source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source

    For centuries, biblical scholars followed the Augustinian hypothesis: that the Gospel of Matthew was the first to be written, Mark used Matthew in the writing of his, and Luke followed both Matthew and Mark in his (the Gospel of John is quite different from the other three, which because of their similarity are called the Synoptic Gospels).

  8. Protocanonical books - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocanonical_books

    Most of the protocanonical books were broadly accepted among early Christians. However, some were omitted by a few of the earliest canons, The Marcionites, an early Christian sect that was dominant in some parts of the Roman Empire, [7] recognised a reduced canon excluding the entire Hebrew Bible in favor of a modified version of Luke and ten of the Pauline epistles.

  9. Western text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_text-type

    In textual criticism of the New Testament, the Western text-type is one of the main text types. It is the predominant form of the New Testament text witnessed in the Old Latin and Syriac translations from the Greek , and also in quotations from certain 2nd and 3rd-century Christian writers, including Cyprian , Tertullian and Irenaeus .

  1. Ads

    related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file pdf version