enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of scientific misconduct incidents - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific...

    A Lancet review on Handling of Scientific Misconduct in Scandinavian countries gave examples of policy definitions. In Denmark, scientific misconduct is defined as "intention[al] negligence leading to fabrication of the scientific message or a false credit or emphasis given to a scientist", and in Sweden as "intention[al] distortion of the ...

  3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  4. Wikipedia:Plagiarism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Plagiarism

    Plagiarism is taking credit for someone else's writing as your own, including their language and ideas, without providing adequate credit. [1] The University of Cambridge defines plagiarism as: "submitting as one's own work, irrespective of intent to deceive, that which derives in part or in its entirety from the work of others without due acknowledgement."

  5. Plagiarism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

    The authors of a 2019 systematic literature review on academic plagiarism detection [65] derived a four-leven typology of academic plagiarism, from the total words of a language , from its syntax, from its semantics, and from methods to capture plagiarism of ideas and structures. The typology categorizes plagiarism forms according to the layer ...

  6. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals.

  7. Five whys - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_whys

    Five whys (or 5 whys) is an iterative interrogative technique used to explore the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a particular problem. [1] The primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a defect or problem by repeating the question "why?" five times, each time directing the current "why" to the answer of the ...

  8. images.huffingtonpost.com

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-08-30-3258_001.pdf

    Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM

  9. Plagiarism from Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism_from_Wikipedia

    Jill Bialosky [5] Monica Crowley [6] [7] Elsevier retracted a 2020 book for plagiarizing many large passages from Wikipedia [8] Five Star Movement (Italian political party) [9] Jane Goodall [10] Kamala Harris [11] [12] Michel Houellebecq [13] International Baccalaureate Organisation (IBO) was accused of copying confidential examiner marking ...