Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The table shown on the right can be used in a two-sample t-test to estimate the sample sizes of an experimental group and a control group that are of equal size, that is, the total number of individuals in the trial is twice that of the number given, and the desired significance level is 0.05. [4]
For highly correlated input data the one-in-10 rule (10 observations or labels needed per feature) may not be directly applicable due to the high correlation of the features: For images there is a rule of thumb that per class 1000 examples are needed. [11]
Informally, in attempting to estimate the causal effect of some variable X ("covariate" or "explanatory variable") on another Y ("dependent variable"), an instrument is a third variable Z which affects Y only through its effect on X. For example, suppose a researcher wishes to estimate the causal effect of smoking (X) on general health (Y). [5]
A variable is a logical set of attributes. [1] Variables can "vary" – for example, be high or low. [ 1 ] How high, or how low, is determined by the value of the attribute (and in fact, an attribute could be just the word "low" or "high"). [ 1 ] (
One method conjectured by Good and Hardin is =, where is the sample size, is the number of independent variables and is the number of observations needed to reach the desired precision if the model had only one independent variable. [24] For example, a researcher is building a linear regression model using a dataset that contains 1000 patients ().
Frequency distribution: Shows the number of observations of a particular variable for a given interval, such as the number of years in which the stock market return is between intervals such as 0–10%, 11–20%, etc. A histogram, a type of bar chart, may be used for this analysis. [55]
Repeated measures design is a research design that involves multiple measures of the same variable taken on the same or matched subjects either under different conditions or over two or more time periods. [1] For instance, repeated measurements are collected in a longitudinal study in which change over time is assessed.
Hypothesis testing (and Type I/II errors) was devised by Neyman and Pearson as a more objective alternative to Fisher's p-value, also meant to determine researcher behaviour, but without requiring any inductive inference by the researcher. [11] [12] Neyman & Pearson considered a different problem to Fisher (which they called "hypothesis testing").