enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: top iphone cases belt clip holster supreme court review
  2. etsy.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month

    • Star Sellers

      Highlighting Bestselling Items From

      Some Of Our Exceptional Sellers

    • Laptop Stickers

      Unique Laptop Stickers And More.

      Find Remarkable Creations On Etsy.

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williamson_v._Mazda_Motor...

    Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 562 U.S. 323 (2011), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court unanimously held that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208, promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, does not federally preempt state tort lawsuits against auto manufacturers from injuries caused by a defective lack of ...

  3. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  4. Apple Inc. v. Pepper - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Pepper

    Apple Inc. v. Pepper, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case related to antitrust laws related to third-party resellers. The case centers on Apple Inc.'s App Store, and whether consumers of apps offered through the store have Article III standing under federal antitrust laws to bring a class-action antitrust lawsuit against Apple for practices it uses to regulate the App ...

  5. List of pending United States Supreme Court cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pending_United...

    June 10, 2024. (November 6, 2024) FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C. 23-1038. Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit erred in setting aside FDA’s denial orders of respondents' applications for authorization to market new e-cigarette products as arbitrary and capricious. July 2, 2024.

  6. Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Town_of_Gilbert

    I, Gilbert, Ariz., Land Development Code (Sign Code or Code), ch. 1, §4.402 (2005) Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when municipalities may impose content-based restrictions on signage. The case also clarified the level of constitutional scrutiny that should be applied ...

  7. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung...

    35 U.S.C. § 289. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones ...

  8. Cullen v. Pinholster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cullen_v._Pinholster

    Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170, is a 2011 United States Supreme Court case concerning evidentiary development in federal habeas corpus proceedings. Oral arguments in the case took place on November 9, 2010, and the Supreme Court issued its decision on April 4, 2011. The Supreme Court held 5–4 that only evidence originally presented before ...

  9. Scott Peterson’s most outrageous defense claims, debunked - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/scott-peterson-most-outrageous...

    Peterson's latest appeal suffered a setback this summer when a judge decided most of the evidence he wanted retested shouldn't be. But the court allowed his request for new testing on some ...

  1. Ads

    related to: top iphone cases belt clip holster supreme court review