Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
These compilations of Oregon Administrative Rules expanded over the years – the 1957–1963 editions were published in two loose leaf volumes, the 2009 edition comprises 18 volumes. The Oregon Administrative Rules is organized by chapters, with each chapter representing a government agency (Chapter 110 for example is the Capitol Planning ...
Oregon Ballot Measure 37 was a controversial land-use ballot initiative that passed in the U.S. state of Oregon in 2004 and is now codified as Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 195.305. Measure 37 has figured prominently in debates about the rights of property owners versus the public's right to enforce environmental and other land use regulations.
The Office of the Legislative Counsel prepares and publishes the softcover multi-volume Oregon Revised Statutes every two years, after each biennial legislative session. The Oregon Legislature created the Oregon Revised Statutes by recodifying the previous code, which was called the Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated (1940). See 1953 Or. Laws c. 3 ...
Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 28, 1934 The Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 ( TGA , Pub. L. 73–482 ) is a United States federal law that provides for the regulation of grazing on the public lands (excluding Alaska ) to improve rangeland conditions and regulate their use.
Grazing rights is the right of a user to allow their livestock to feed (graze) in a given area. Grazing rights in action: Leyton Marshes in London , where historic grazing (and other) rights are still in place, although not always willingly acceded by the authorities A large sheep farm in Chile .
Livestock and poultry producers will need to comply with more specific standards if they want to label their products organic under final rules announced Wednesday by the U.S. Department of ...
Signed into law by President Warren G. Harding on August 15, 1921 The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 ( 7 U.S.C. §§ 181-229b; P&S Act ) regulates meatpacking , livestock dealers, market agencies, live poultry dealers, and swine contractors to prohibit unfair or deceptive practices, giving undue preferences, apportioning supply ...
Today, a vehicle has a much higher chance of hitting a wild animal than livestock. [11] Laws are still in flux. In Arizona, livestock must be fenced in within incorporated areas, but are still listed only as a potential nuisance for unincorporated suburbs. [11] Therefore, in that state, bills were being pushed to get rid of this "antiquated" law.