enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field.

  3. Peer critique - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_critique

    Peer critique, a specialized form of critique, is the common practice of professional peers, especially writers, reviewing and providing constructive criticism of each other's work before that work is turned in for credit or professional review.

  4. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work . [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.

  5. Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    (Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.) Template documentation [ view ] [ edit ] [ history ] [ purge ]

  6. Clinical peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_peer_review

    Clinical peer review, also known as medical peer review is the process by which health care professionals, including those in nursing and pharmacy, evaluate each other's clinical performance. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] A discipline-specific process may be referenced accordingly (e.g., physician peer review , nursing peer review ).

  7. Software peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_peer_review

    In the free / open source community, something like peer review has taken place in the engineering and evaluation of computer software. In this context, the rationale for peer review has its equivalent in Linus's law , often phrased: "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow", meaning "If there are enough reviewers, all problems are easy to ...

  8. Technical peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_peer_review

    The purpose of a technical peer review is to remove defects as early as possible in the development process. By removing defects at their origin (e.g., requirements and design documents, test plans and procedures, software code, etc.), technical peer reviews prevent defects from propagating through multiple phases and work products and reduce the overall amount of rework necessary on projects.

  9. Wikipedia : Peer review/Why Peer Review Is a Good Idea Here

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Why...

    1 Why Peer Review Is a Good Idea Here, Example 1: 2 Why Peer Review Is a Good Idea Here, Example 2: Toggle the table of contents. Wikipedia: ...