enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The aim of the PRISMA statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [3] PRISMA has mainly focused on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials, but it can also be used as a basis for reporting reviews of other types of research (e.g., diagnostic studies, observational studies).

  3. Newcastle–Ottawa scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle–Ottawa_scale

    In statistics, the Newcastle–Ottawa scale is a tool used for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies included in a systematic review and/or meta-analyses.Using the tool, each study is judged on eight items, categorized into three groups: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case ...

  4. GRADE approach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRADE_approach

    The software is free for non-profit organizations and is available online. [8] The GRADE approach to assess the certainty in evidence is widely applicable, including to questions about diagnosis, [ 9 ] [ 10 ] prognosis, [ 11 ] [ 12 ] network meta-analysis [ 13 ] and public health.

  5. Critical appraisal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_appraisal

    Critical appraisal (or quality assessment) in evidence based medicine, is the use of explicit, transparent methods to assess the data in published research, applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity, adherence to reporting standards, conclusions, generalizability and risk-of-bias.

  6. Jadad scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jadad_scale

    To evaluate the general quality of medical research in a particular field. [10] [11] [12] To set a minimum standard for the paper's results to be included in a meta analysis. A researcher conducting a systematic review for example might elect to exclude all papers on the topic with a Jadad score of 3 or less. [13]

  7. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  8. Meta-analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-analysis

    Meta-analysis is a method of synthesis of quantitative data from multiple independent studies addressing a common research question. An important part of this method involves computing a combined effect size across all of the studies.

  9. Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-assisted...

    Computer-assisted (or aided) qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) offers tools that assist with qualitative research such as transcription analysis, coding and text interpretation, recursive abstraction, content analysis, discourse analysis, [1] grounded theory methodology, etc.