Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Paul v. Virginia: 75 U.S. 168 (1869) Privileges & Immunities Clause does not apply to corporations, Commerce Clause does not apply to insurance policies Hepburn v. Griswold: 75 U.S. 603 (1870) constitutionality of legal tender laws Baker v. Morton: 79 U.S. 150 (1870) land claims in the Nebraska Territory: United States v. Klein: 80 U.S. 128 ...
Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 168 (1869), is a U.S. corporate law decision by the United States Supreme Court.It held that a corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
Virginia v. West Virginia, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 39 (1871), is a 6–3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that if a governor has discretion in the conduct of the election, the legislature is bound by his action and cannot undo the results based on fraud.
This category is for case law of the United ... 1860s; 1870s; 1880s; 1890s; 1900s; 1910s; Pages in category "1869 in United States case law" ... Paul v. Virginia; R ...
Virginia Military Institute was the last public college in Virginia to integrate, first admitting black cadets in 1968, [54] [55] [56] but interracial problems persisted long afterward. [ 56 ] [ 55 ] According to The Washington Post , even in 2020 "Black cadets still endure[d] relentless racism [in an] atmosphere of hostility and cultural ...
United States v. Todd (1794) Case regarding invalid pension of a Revolutionary War veteran. The case was initially unpublished, a note paraphrasing the case was appended to the opinion in United States v. Ferreira, 54 U.S. 40, 52 (1849). A transcript of the records of the case is published in Washington and Lee Law Review.
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) State laws in opposition to national laws are void. The U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction for any U.S. case and final say. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) The power to regulate interstate navigation is granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Barron v.
The case was known as Anderson v. Griswold in the Colorado state courts. The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump's actions before and during the attack constituted engagement in insurrection ; their assertion is that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies presidential candidates who have engaged in insurrection against the United ...