Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The boom in mortgage lending, including subprime lending, was also driven by a fast expansion of non-bank independent mortgage originators which despite their smaller share (around 25% in 2002) in the market have contributed to around 50% of the increase in mortgage credit between 2003 and 2005. [114]
2002-2006: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac combined purchases of incorrectly rated AAA subprime mortgage-backed securities rise from $38 billion to $90 billion per year. [76] [77] [78] Lenders began to offer loans to higher-risk borrowers, [79] Subprime mortgages amounted to $600 billion (20%) by 2006. [80] [81] Speculation in residential real ...
One study, by a legal firm which counsels financial services entities on Community Reinvestment Act compliance, found that CRA-covered institutions were less likely to make subprime loans (only 20–25% of all subprime loans), and when they did the interest rates were lower. The banks were half as likely to resell the loans to other parties. [114]
Driven by the subprime mortgage crisis of the late 2000s, the 30-year mortgage rate tumbled from about 8 percent at the start of the decade down to 5.4 percent by 2009.
"Subprime Lending". United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2006-03-24. Archived from the original on 2007-03-19. "Q&A: Sub-prime lending". BBC. 2007-03-14. "The Rise and Fall of Subprime Mortgages" (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. November 2007. "Jan 15 2008 Main sub-prime losses reported]". BBC News. January 15, 2008
Subprime I was smaller in size — in the mid-1990s $30 billion of mortgages constituted "a big year" for subprime lending, by 2005 there were $625 billion in subprime mortgage loans, $507 billion of which were in mortgage backed securities — and was essentially "really high rates for borrowers with bad credit".
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
In order for the deal to go through J.P. Morgan Chase required [24] the Fed to issue a nonrecourse loan of $29 billion to Bear Stearns. [25] [4] This means that the loan is collateralized by mortgage debt [26] and that the government can't go after J.P. Morgan Chase's assets if the mortgage debt collateral becomes insufficient to repay the loan ...