Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(The Center Square) – The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked a controversial California law that would have eventually required social media users in the state to verify their ages to ...
(The Center Square) - A federal court partially blocked a California law restricting social media access for minors, blocking its ban on social media notifications for minors during certain hours ...
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC and NetChoice, LLC v.Paxton, 603 U.S. 707 (2024), were United States Supreme Court cases related to protected speech under the First Amendment and content moderation by interactive service providers on the Internet under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
The lawsuit, fil (The Center Square) - Technology group NetChoice filed for an emergency injunction Monday to block California's new social media law before it takes effect January 1, arguing the ...
Internet censorship in the United States of America is the suppression of information published or viewed on the Internet in the United States.The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech and expression against federal, state, and local government censorship.
TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, 604 U.S. ___ (2025), was a United States Supreme Court case brought by ByteDance Ltd. and TikTok on the constitutionality of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) based on the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Bill of Attainder Clause of Article One, Section Nine, and the Due Process Clause and Takings ...
The State Department has been hit with a lawsuit demanding records pertaining to its now-defunct Global Engagement Center (GEC) subagency, which funneled US taxpayers' money toward censorship ...
Whether Section 230 protects social media firms from what their algorithms produce remains a question in case law. The Supreme Court considered this question in regard to terrorism content in the forementioned Gonzalez and Taamneh cases, but neither addressed if Section 230 protected social media firms for the product of their algorithms. [ 89 ]