enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pascal's wager - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_wager

    So, supposing that reason cannot determine the truth between the two options, one must "wager" by weighing the possible consequences. Pascal's assumption is that, when it comes to making the decision, no one can refuse to participate; withholding assent is impossible because we are already "embarked", effectively living out the choice.

  3. Argument from nonbelief - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_nonbelief

    First, Schellenberg says that he has given known reasons to think that a perfectly loving being would always be open to a personal relationship; ipso facto, God would not sacrifice some time in the relationship for the sake of unknown greater goods, [21] and if the greatest good for finite creatures is to be in a relationship with God, then God ...

  4. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_claims...

    [7] [16] [26] Academic David Deming notes that it would be "impossible to base all rational thought and scientific methodology on an aphorism whose meaning is entirely subjective". He instead argues that "extraordinary evidence" should be regarded as a sufficient amount of evidence rather than evidence deemed of extraordinary quality. [ 27 ]

  5. Argument from reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason

    The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis .

  6. Russell's teapot - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot

    Russell's teapot modelled on the Ichthys.. Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making empirically unfalsifiable claims, as opposed to shifting the burden of disproof to others.

  7. The Surprising Reason We’re Fighting Over the Supreme ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/surprising-reason-fighting-over...

    News. Science & Tech

  8. Why Do Supreme Court Justices Serve for Life? - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-supreme-court-justices-serve...

    It's a question many have about the U.S.'s highest court—and the rationale dates back to America's founding. The post Why Do Supreme Court Justices Serve for Life? appeared first on Reader's Digest.

  9. Ontological argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument

    A being that exists as an idea in the mind and in reality is, other things being equal, greater than a being that exists only as an idea in the mind. Thus, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God (that is, a being-than-which-none-greater-can-be-imagined that does exist).