Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In computer programming, lazy initialization is the tactic of delaying the creation of an object, the calculation of a value, or some other expensive process until the first time it is needed.
C# is a language in which the null object pattern can be properly implemented. This example shows animal objects that display sounds and a NullAnimal instance used in place of the C# null keyword. The null object provides consistent behaviour and prevents a runtime null reference exception that would occur if the C# null keyword were used instead.
In software engineering, double-checked locking (also known as "double-checked locking optimization" [1]) is a software design pattern used to reduce the overhead of acquiring a lock by testing the locking criterion (the "lock hint") before acquiring the lock.
With lazy initialization, the object is first set to null. Whenever the object is requested, the object is checked, and if it is null, the object is then immediately created and returned. For example, lazy loading for a widget can be implemented in the C# programming language as such:
When an array of objects is declared, e.g. MyClass x[10];; or allocated dynamically, e.g. new MyClass [10]. The default constructor of MyClass is used to initialize all the elements. When a derived class constructor does not explicitly call the base class constructor in its initializer list, the default constructor for the base class is called.
Another example can be when dealing with structs. In the code snippet below, we have a struct student which contains some variables describing the information about a student. The function register_student leaks memory contents because it fails to fully initialize the members of struct student new_student.
C# have records which provide immutability and equality testing. [1] The record is sealed to prevent inheritance. [2] It overrides the built-in ToString() method. [3]This example implementation includes a static method which can be used to initialize a new instance with a randomly generated globally unique identifier (GUID).
C# 3.0 introduced type inference, allowing the type specifier of a variable declaration to be replaced by the keyword var, if its actual type can be statically determined from the initializer. This reduces repetition, especially for types with multiple generic type-parameters , and adheres more closely to the DRY principle.