enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Patentable subject matter in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter...

    Patentable subject matter in the United States is governed by 35 U.S.C. 101. The current patentable subject matter practice in the U.S. is very different from the corresponding practices by WIPO/Patent Cooperation Treaty and by the European Patent Office, and it is considered to be broader in general.

  3. Patentable subject matter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter

    Patentable subject matter in the United States is governed by 35 U.S.C. 101. The two particularly contentious areas, with numerous reversals of prior legislative and judicial decisions, have been computer-based and biological inventions. [9] [10] The US practice of patentable subject matter is very different from that of the European Patent Office.

  4. United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_patent_law

    One author of the US Patent Act of 1952 stated that patentable subject matter should encompass "anything under the sun that is made by man." [16] At that time, the USPTO and US courts interpreted both "anything" and "made by man" quite broadly. However, the meaning of these terms has been narrowed substantially over the years.

  5. Title 35 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_35_of_the_United...

    35 U.S.C. 103 Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter. (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would ...

  6. State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Street_Bank_&_Trust...

    Finding for plaintiff, 927 F. Supp. 502, 38 U.S.P.Q.2d 1530 (D. Mass. 1996) (finding U.S. Patent No. 5,193,056 invalid for lack of statutory subject matter) Holding; A claim is eligible for protection by a patent in the United States if it involved some practical application and it produces a useful, concrete and tangible result. Court membership

  7. Software patents under United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under...

    Accordingly, the claimed subject matter did not fit within any of the statutory categories of section 101, which defines patentable subject matter. [43] Moreover, it was intangible, and in the Digitech case, the Federal Circuit had held that except for processes, "eligible subject matter must exist in some physical or tangible form." [44]

  8. Utility (patentability requirement) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_(patentability...

    In United States patent law, utility is a patentability requirement. [1] As provided by 35 U.S.C. § 101, an invention is "useful" if it provides some identifiable benefit and is capable of use and "useless" otherwise. [2]

  9. Patentability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentability

    Patentable subject matter, i.e., a kind of subject-matter eligible for patent protection (also called "statutory patentable subject-matter") Novel (i.e. at least some aspect of it must be new) Non-obvious (in United States patent law ) or involve an inventive step (in European patent law and under the Patent Cooperation Treaty )