Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
RIPng (RIP next generation) is an extension of RIPv2 for support of IPv6, the next generation Internet Protocol. [12] The main differences between RIPv2 and RIPng are: Support of IPv6 networking. While RIPv2 supports RIPv1 updates authentication, RIPng does not. IPv6 routers were, at the time, supposed to use IPsec for authentication. [citation ...
Across Unix-like operating systems many different configuration-file formats exist, with each application or service potentially having a unique format, but there is a strong tradition of them being in human-editable plain text, and a simple key–value pair format is common.
Interior gateway protocols type 2, distance-vector routing protocols, such as Routing Information Protocol, RIPv2, IGRP. Exterior gateway protocols are routing protocols used on the Internet for exchanging routing information between Autonomous Systems, such as Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), a path-vector routing protocol.
RIPscrip icon (.ICN) file format was that of the BGI getImage() and putImage() functions. The choice to include the BGI flood fill function was considered by many [ 1 ] to be a mistake, as third-party implementations of the RIPscrip protocol often failed [ citation needed ] to implement Bezier curves the same way Telegrafix had, thus leading to ...
For example, the Routing Information Protocol (RIPv2) uses 224.0.0.9, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) uses 224.0.0.5 and 224.0.0.6, and Multicast DNS uses 224.0.0.251. Routers must not forward these messages outside the subnet from which they originate. Internetwork control block
R1(config)# ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 backupLink 1 254 In the event that two routing protocols are configured with the same administrative distance, the Cisco router will ignore the configured values and instead use the default values.
it should be noted that rip-mti isn't a different protocol. it is used with ripv2, and "just" changes how the routing daemon behaves. -- 212.18.18.20 ( talk ) 12:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC) [ reply ] Technical Details should be based on the latest protocol version.
For example, this allows a central file server to establish an aggregate 2-gigabit connection using two 1-gigabit NICs teamed together. Note the data signaling rate will still be 1 Gbit/s , which can be misleading depending on methodologies used to test throughput after link aggregation is employed.