Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Kansas v. Colorado is a longstanding litigation before the Supreme Court of the United States between US states: Kansas and Colorado regarding the payment for the use of the Arkansas River. The Court has rendered numerous opinions on the case: Kansas v. Colorado, 185 U.S. 125 (1902) Kansas v. Colorado, 206 U.S. 46 (1907) Colorado v. Kansas, 320 ...
Kansas v. Colorado: Supreme Court of the United States: 1902, 1907, 1943, 1995, 2001, 2004, 2009 Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation: Climate: destruction of a community by climate change: United States federal courts: 2009 Kleppe v. New Mexico: Wildlife: horses and burros: Supreme Court of the United States: 1976 Koontz v. St. Johns River Water ...
Case name Citation Date decided Bartlett v. Strickland: 556 U.S. 1: 2008: Vaden v. Discover Bank: 556 U.S. 49: 2008: Vermont v. Brillon: 556 U.S. 81: 2008: Kansas v.
A judge dismissed, with prejudice, a lawsuit that sought to try and force the state of Colorado to allow sheriff's deputies to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A Kansas community college that was accused of trying to reduce the number of Black student-athletes has agreed to a settlement, the Justice Department announced Monday. The department said in a ...
Delaware (2008), [9] and water rights between riparian states upstream of navigable waters in Kansas v. Colorado. [10] On one occasion, United States v. Shipp (1906), a criminal complaint was filed directly to the court, following the lynching of a defendant whose appeal to the court had been granted. The case brought against those responsible ...
In federal court in Arkansas, U.S. District Judge James M. Moody Jr. ruled May 23 that Arkansas didn't prove it had standing to sue and dismissed that state as a plaintiff. He then transferred the ...