Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The two companies have been negotiating a new contract to keep Disney's content on DirecTV's satellite and streaming services, including U-Verse TV, as a five-year contract ended Sept. 1.
DirecTV users lose access to ESPN, ABC and other Disney channels amid contract dispute. September 2, 2024 at 7:06 AM. Shutterstock.
The 2009 dispute between Time Warner Cable and Fox is an example of a carriage dispute involving an over-the-air broadcaster. The dispute pitted the second largest United States cable system against one of the four major U.S. television networks, whose broadcasts included the popular prime time series American Idol and National Football League ...
A Bloomberg estimate valuated the dispute at a loss of US$4 billion for The Walt Disney Company, while Paramount Global chief executive Bob Bakish estimated the dispute cost programmers and operators US$15 billion in market value. Airings of The View and episodes of the final season of Archer that had
On August 27, 2012, Big Ten Network (BTN) and Dish Network (Dish) began a dispute over the extant contract. This contract expired on August 31, 2012, the day before the college football season started. [58] On September 1, 2012, Big Ten Network and Dish Network entered into a short-term arrangement and avoided a blackout. [59]
In contract law, a forum selection clause (sometimes called a dispute resolution clause, choice of court clause, governing law clause, jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause, depending on its form) in a contract with a conflict of laws element allows the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum.
Starlink’s satellite communication gives it some advantages over the FAA’s current fiber optics infrastructure. Switching the contract, however, could raise conflict-of-interest concerns ...
The Contract Disputes Act of 1978 ("CDA", Pub. L. 95–563, 92 Stat. 2383), which became effective on March 1, 1979, establishes the procedures for handling "claims" relating to United States Federal Government contracts. It is codified, as amended, at 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109.