Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Title VII prohibits employers from treating applicants or employees differently because of their membership in a protected class. A disparate treatment violation is made out when an individual of a protected group is shown to have been singled out and treated less favorably than others similarly situated on the basis of an impermissible ...
Great Dane Trailers, Inc., [75] the Supreme Court held that an employer could avoid being charged with a ULP if it could provide a legitimate and substantial business justification for treating union workers differently than its other employees. However, even if the employer could offer such a justification, the NLRB could still attempt to show ...
United States labor law sets the rights and duties for employees, labor unions, and employers in the US. Labor law's basic aim is to remedy the "inequality of bargaining power" between employees and employers, especially employers "organized in the corporate or other forms of ownership association". [3]
Memo To Bosses: Stop Treating Employees Like Children. Tony Schwartz. Updated July 14, 2016 at 9:49 PM. productive employees work from home.
In this section, two theories are laid out: disparate treatment and disparate impact. Disparate treatment is what most people commonly think of discrimination- intentional. Under this theory, the employee must belong to a protected class, apply and be qualified for a job where the employer was seeking applicants, and get rejected from the job ...
This was the first official government document that listed the 80% test in the context of adverse impact, and was later codified in the 1978 Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, a document used by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Department of Labor, and Department of Justice in Title VII enforcement. [14]
Rather than armed thugs or slick pickpockets committing the crime, it’s employers who fail to pay the wages and benefits their employees are guaranteed by law. “There are three reasons for ...
Goldman Sachs unfairly dismissed an employee while he was on paternity leave, a U.K. employment tribunal found, ruling that this amounted to unlawful sex discrimination. The executive is seeking ...